- #Win Season 3 Of Grand Slam Tennis 2 Full 4 In#
- #Win Season 3 Of Grand Slam Tennis 2 Trial And Error#
Win Season 3 Of Grand Slam Tennis 2 Full 4 In
For this one you need to win all 4 Grand Slam tournaments in 2 separate seasons, NOT the full 4 in those 2 seasons.
Ok you might say thats ok I can live with that, and I agree but the one thing which absolutely kilss this game is they way they have done the Ai difficulty in the career. Compared to Top Spin 4 its severely lacking , not half as many smaller tournaments of competitions to enter and Top Spin 4' s player progression is much more advanced than this. But the heart of the game the Career is awful.
And that's where my positives end, because for whatever time EA Sports spent in game mechanics, they seemingly spent no time whatsoever in the orchestration of the user experience across the different modes and usage patterns. The controls strike a good balance between simplicity and sophistication.* The commentary is entertaining, if a little repetitive over time. This game has some really entertaining game play/mechanics, looking at it strictly from the standpoint of what you do when you're in a match. … Full Review »This game has some really entertaining game play/mechanics, looking at it strictly from the standpoint of what you do when you're in a match. Get Top Spin 4 for a tennis game that will keep you coming back. Impossible to put the ball out.Poor effort by EA.the demo sold me this game, but the final product is rubbish.avoid at all costs.
Somebody-should-be-fired awful. Simply awful, not production quality at all. And the accompanying help screens? EA, you may as well have just written "TODO" on each page of documentation, for all of the lack of value of the sparse information presented. "Okay, so what to I click on now?"), and most of the time, once you do figure them out, don't make any real sense at all from an intuitiveness standpoint. Navigation options are often incredibly difficult to decipher, based on their descriptions (i.e. The navigation through screens, modes, transitions, etc., is quite simply the worst and most unintuitive I've used in a game in as long as I can remember.
I lost one match in the entire 24 months of play. The first two years of your career are a total cakewalk. The career mode is unbelievably unrealistic and decidedly unrewarding.
Win Season 3 Of Grand Slam Tennis 2 Trial And Error
What? The worst part about this player feedback/improvement system, to me, is the fact that you don't develop better skills by virtue of playing (and winning). And at first glance it looks like you're on a yearly quest to achieve some laundry list of win objectives that conflict with other goals, only to figure out later that all of those objectives just carry over into the next year after year anyway, if you didn't complete them in the year specified. They may occasionally coincide with an enhanced racket or some attribute points, but then again you're never clear in the beginning about whether you should even play the exhibition matches (which are the only ones to yield these improvements), since it's an either/or proposition to playing in the tournament going on at the same time (the either/or proposition is something you have to find out by trial and error). You collect these "yearly" and "career-long" goal accomplishments that translate into "points", but the points have absolutely no bearing on how well your follow-up skills and games are going to progress. What's more, there's nothing particularly rewarding about winning. There's a complete disconnect and inconsistency in CPU player experience, from match to match.
What? And in the end, who cares? Because none of the players you play against have any meaningful ranking at all, let alone a ranking that measures against your own. The end result is that, after two years and 8 Grand Slam wins in a row, I end up ranked 25th. What's also totally unrealistic, with respect to following real tennis as a fan, is that your "rank" improvements are entirely tied to this independent point-gathering system, which has nothing to do with the players you're playing (only the position in the tournament at which you face them). It's completely divorced from reality, which to me isn't a good quality in a reality simulator.
If you care about the progression of your games, as opposed to simply playing to play, this game is not going to be for you, by a wide margin. The rest of it, from story to navigation to incentives, is quite simply an afterthought, and in no way resembles a production-quality experience. This game has production-quality mechanics.
In the next season of your career, it does get better. And even for beginner players, this is far too easy, and for the first 8 (ish) hours you win every match you play (and some would be against the likes of Roger Federer and Serena Williams) and the only way you would lose is if you did it on purpose. The first season is set to the easiest difficulty, which is Rookie. Your star can play for ten seasons, with each getting progressively harder. However, career mode is diabolical.
There's so many ways to make your player different, and so many options to make him/her personal to you. On the more positive side, the players look very realistic, and the movement looks good (Although occasionally the players almost teleport to the ball to return it, but it can be funny.) There is also an option on the main menu and when you start a career to make your own tennis player. But by then, you've been playing for a long time, with few things to actually challenge you. Eventually, it does get to be quite challenging, and can give a lot of entertainment.
To conclude, I think you would be better off buying a different tennis game like Top Spin 4, as Grand Slam Tennis gets boring and repetitive so easily, and the career mode just isn't worth playing.
0 kommentar(er)
